The High Court in Lane v Lane clarifies when executors can be removed, emphasising that beneficiary interests are paramount and warning executors about personal costs liability for misconduct.
The latest insights and updates from our team.
The latest insights and updates from our team.
The High Court in Lane v Lane clarifies when executors can be removed, emphasising that beneficiary interests are paramount and warning executors about personal costs liability for misconduct.
The Law Commission’s May 2025 report proposes revolutionary changes to will-making including electronic wills, ending automatic revocation on marriage, and allowing wills from age 16.
The Court of Appeal in Winter v Winter confirms that devoting your working life to a family farm based on inheritance promises creates valid proprietary estoppel claims, even without proving specific alternative opportunities foregone.
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Rea v Rea [2024] EWCA Civ 169 has fundamentally reshaped undue influence law, establishing that such claims are “inherently improbable” and require proof that coercion is the most likely explanation for a will’s contents.
The High Court in Leonard v Leonard [2024] EWHC 321 (Ch) has definitively confirmed that the Victorian-era Banks v Goodfellow test remains the sole standard for assessing testamentary capacity, rejecting suggestions that the Mental Capacity Act 2005 should replace it.